The value of graded nursing of trauma assessment in emergency trauma patients
创伤评估的分级护理在急诊创伤患者急救中的价值

摘要

目的:本篇文章旨在开展对比实验以深入探究采用创伤评估分级护理对于急诊创伤患者的急救 效果，以减少急诊中因救治不及时而产生的不必要伤亡，提高急诊创伤患者的救治效果，提高患者治疗满 意度。方法:随机选取 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月来院治疗的 100 例急诊创伤患者，2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月患者为对照组，采用急诊常规护理救治措施，2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月患者被分为观察组，医院开 始实行创伤评估的分级护理，两组每组 50 人。观察两组患者的在救治过程及后续的伤情护理人员理论考核、 技能考核、伤情评估正确率、护理满意度及急救时间，来判断护理方法不同对患者产生的影响。结果:采用 传统常规护理方法的对照组中伤情护理人员理论考核成绩平均为 78 分，技能考核平均为良，伤情评估正确 率为 67%，急救时间平均为 4.5 小时，患者护理满意度平均为 3.2 分。而采用创伤评估的分级护理方法的观 察组中伤情护理人员理论考核成绩平均为 89 分，技能考核平均为优，伤情评估正确率为 83%，急救时间平 均为 3.2 小时，患者护理满意度平均为 4.7 分。结论:根据数据记录显示，采用创伤评估的分级护理方法的观 察组比采用传统常规护理方法的对照组护理人员理论及技能考核分数高，患者伤情评估正确率高，急救时 间短，患者护理满意度打分高。说明在急诊创伤患者急救中采用创伤评估的分级护理会产生良好效果，对 于患者和医院双方都有裨益，值得大力应用推广。

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to carry out a comparative experiment to deeply explore the first aid effect of trauma assessment and graded nursing for emergency trauma patients, so as to reduce unnecessary casualties caused by untimely treatment in emergency, and improve the treatment of emergency trauma patients. effect and improve patient satisfaction with treatment.
Methods: A total of 100 emergency trauma patients who came to the hospital for treatment from August 2018 to December 2019 were randomly selected, and the patients from August 2018 to December 2019 were the control group, who were treated with emergency routine nursing care measures, from August 2018 to 2019 In December, the patients were divided into observation groups, and the hospital began to implement graded care for trauma assessment, with 50 people in each group. The treatment process of the two groups of patients and the subsequent theoretical assessment, skill assessment, injury assessment accuracy rate, nursing satisfaction and emergency time of the injured nursing staff were observed to judge the impact of different nursing methods on the patients.
Results: In the control group with traditional routine nursing method, the average score of injury nursing staff in theoretical assessment was 78, the average skill assessment was good, the correct rate of injury assessment was 67%, the average first aid time was 4.5 hours, and the average patient nursing satisfaction 3.2 points. In the observation group using the trauma assessment graded nursing method, the average theoretical assessment score of the injured nurses was 89 points, the average skill assessment was excellent, the correct rate of injury assessment was 83%, the average first aid time was 3.2 hours, and the patientswere satisfied with nursing. The average score was 4.7 points.
Conclusion  s:According to the data records,the observation group using the trauma assessment grading nursing method has higher scores on the theory and skill assessment of the nursing staff than the control group using the traditional routine nursing method, with high patient care satisfaction scores. It shows that the use of graded nursing of trauma assessment in emergency trauma patients will produce good results, which is beneficial to both patients and hospitals, and is worthy of vigorous application and promotion