摘要
目的 研究人工智能（AI）辅助评估工具在消化内镜术前肠道准备护理中的应用效果。方法 随机选取山西白求恩医院消化内科收治的86例消化内镜术前肠道准备患者，按随机数表法分组，每组43例。对照组实施常规护理，观察组通过AI辅助评估工具获取肠道准备指导，对比两组肠道准备质量、息肉和腺瘤的检出率、不良反应发生率以及护理满意度。结果 肠道准备合格率反馈结果，观察组为97.67%（42/43），对照组为81.39%（35/43），差异显著（χ2=6.081，P=0.014）。观察组患者的肠道清洁度高于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组的腺瘤、息肉检出率均高于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组的不良反应发生率更低，护理满意度更高，均优于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 在消化内镜术前肠道准备护理中应用AI辅助评估工具可提高肠道清洁度及腺瘤、息肉检出率，同时可以降低不良反应发生率，改善其护理满意度。
关键词： 消化内镜；术前肠道准备；护理；人工智能辅助评估工具
Abstract
Objective To study the application effect of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted evaluation tools in preoperative gastrointestinal preparation nursing for digestive endoscopy. Methods 86 patients with preoperative gastrointestinal preparation for digestive endoscopy admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology of Shanxi Bethune Hospital were randomly selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method, with 43 patients in each group. The control group received routine care, while the observation group obtained gastrointestinal preparation guidance through AI-assisted evaluation tools. The quality of gastrointestinal preparation, the detection rate of polyps and adenomas, the incidence of adverse reactions, and the nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results The feedback results of gastrointestinal preparation qualification rate showed that the observation group was 97.67% (42/43), while the control group was 81.39% (35/43), with a significant difference (χ2 = 6.081, P = 0.014). The intestinal cleanliness of patients in the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The detection rates of adenomas and polyps in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower, and the nursing satisfaction was higher, both better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of AI-assisted evaluation tools in preoperative gastrointestinal preparation nursing for digestive endoscopy can improve intestinal cleanliness and the detection rate of adenomas and polyps, while reducing the incidence of adverse reactions and improving the nursing satisfaction.
Key words： Digestive endoscopy; Preoperative gastrointestinal preparation; Nursing; AI-assisted evaluation tools
参考文献 References
[1] 韩旭,郭亚慧,时晓冬,等.2019版《中国消化内镜诊疗相关肠道准备指南》解读[J].临床荟萃,2020,35(1):72-75.
[2] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会结直肠学组.结肠镜检查肠道准备专家共识意见（2023，广州）[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2023,40(6):421-430.
[3] 张娜,徐苗苗,张亚峰,等.结肠镜肠道准备质量受检者影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理研究,2023,37(6):963-969.
[4] REPICI A,BADALAMENTI M,MASELLI R,et al.Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial[J]. Gastroenterology,2020,159:512- 520.
[5] 李穆秋,王静,冯剑飞,等.人工智能辅助系统在基层医院肠镜检查中有效性的单中心研究[J].临床消化病杂志,2026,38(2):71-77.
[6] HERONV, MARTEL M, BESSISSOW T, et al. Comparison of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale with an Auditable Application of the US Multi-Society Task Force Guidelines[J]. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol,2019, 2(2):57-62.
[7] 张尹芳,陈静.行肠镜检查前肠道准备质量影响因素分析[J].现代科学仪器,2021,38(5):177-181.
[8] 张利芳.消化内镜检查患者肠道准备清洁度达标现状及影响因素分析[J].中华养生保健,2025,43(4):106-109.
[9] 戚庆庆,李真,季锐,等.人工智能在规范消化内镜质量控制中的应用[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2021,38(10):774-777.
[10] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会大数据协作组.肠镜人工智能系统临床应用专家共识（2023，武汉）[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2024,41(4):253-262.
[11] 王雪梅,吴练练,于红刚.内镜精灵结肠镜检查对结肠息肉检出率的影响[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2020,37(11):816- 820.
[12] 翁雪健,郑恩典,滕苗苗,等.人工智能辅助结肠镜提高结直肠息肉和腺瘤检出率的研究[J].全科医学临床与教育, 2024,22(11):981-983+987.