摘要
目的 分析风险管理护理用于脑胶质瘤术后的价值。方法 随机均分2023年3月-2025年2月本院接诊脑胶质瘤手术病人（n=62）。试验组采取风险管理护理，对照组行常规护理。对比风险事件等指标。结果 关于风险事件：试验组6.45%，对照组25.81%，P＜0.05。护理质量：试验组高达（98.72±0.64）分，对照组只有（92.79±1.01）分，差异显著（P＜0.05）。抑郁、焦虑自评量表（Self-rating depression scale, SDS; Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS）评分：干预后，试验组低至（33.09±3.75）分、（32.78±4.02）分，对照组高达（47.13±4.74）分、（46.23±4.05）分，差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 脑胶质瘤病人术后用风险管理护理，效果显著，风险事件发生率也更低，心态改善情况更好。
关键词： 脑胶质瘤；风险事件；SDS评分；风险管理护理
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of risk management nursing in postoperative glioma patients. Methods A total of 62 patients with glioma who were admitted to our hospital from March 2023 to February 2025 were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received risk management nursing, while the control group received routine nursing. Risk events and other indicators were compared. Results Regarding risk events: 6.45% in the experimental group and 25.81% in the control group, P<0.05. Nursing quality: The experimental group scored as high as (98.72±0.64), while the control group scored only (92.79±1.01), with significant differences (P<0.05). Self-Rating Depression Scale and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SDS, SAS) scores: After intervention, the experimental group scored as low as (33.09±3.75) and (32.78±4.02), while the control group scored as high as (47.13±4.74) and (46.23±4.05), with significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Postoperative risk management nursing for glioma patients is highly effective, with a lower incidence of risk events and better psychological improvement.
Key words： Glioma; Risk event; SDS score; Risk management nursing
参考文献 References
[1] 孙文文,丁艮晓,梅洁,等. 家属赋权结合心理支持护理在脑胶质瘤患者中的应用研究[J]. 临床研究,2024,32(4): 184-187.
[2] 张康娜,黄娜,季楠,等. 基于"云管理"风险预警的延续性护理在恶性脑胶质瘤患者中的应用效果[J]. 广西医学, 2023,45(24):3065-3068.
[3] 朱玲. 风险管理护理模式在脑胶质瘤患者术后的应用效果[J]. 基层医学论坛（新加坡学术出版社）,2024,6(6):121-122.
[4] CALEB Y. KWON, AUGUSTINO V. SCORZO, RENDALL R. STRAWBRIDGE, et al. Evaluation of multiple fluorescent agents and intraoperative MRI in a novel pig glioma model for fluorescence guided neurosurgery[C]// Molecular-Guided Surgery: Molecules, Devices, and Applications X: At SPIE BiOS.27-28 January 2024.San Francisco, California, United States. 2024: 128250E.1-128250E.5.
[5] 朱珍,李瑞燕,姚雪华. 基于微信的延伸护理服务对恶性脑胶质瘤患者睡眠质量、心理状态、KPS、ADL评分与并发症的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2024,43(4):583-586.
[6] 蔡凤婷,朱柳花,张京华. 以护士为主导的多学科围术期疼痛护理对脑胶质瘤病人术后康复的影响[J]. 循证护理,2024,10(15):2766-2769.
[7] 田宇慧,李康宁,王凡,等. 基于达标互动理论的护理干预策略在脑胶质瘤术后化疗患者中的应用效果[J]. 保健医学研究与实践,2024,21(8):111-116.
[8] 杨丽,和振娜,宋暖. 基于目标导向的护理模式在脑胶质瘤患者中的应用价值及对自护能力的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(18):170-173.
[9] 于蔚蔚,孙文超. 激励式信念干预联合医护共同参与的FTS护理模式在脑胶质瘤患者围手术期护理中的应用价值[J]. 反射疗法与康复医学,2024,5(3):155-158.
[10] 王璐璐,范晓杰. 风险管理护理模式在脑胶质瘤患者术后的应用效果[J]. 河南医学研究,2023,30(27):5163-5165.
[11] 葛建丽. 多元联动健康教育对脑胶质瘤患者术后自我管理效能与并发症的影响[J]. 现代医学,2025,53(1):106-111.