摘要
目的 揭示对急救患者运用急救护理快速反应团队加速急救措施的价值。方法 2024年12月-2025年9月，将144例急救患者随机分两组，各72例，参照组运用常规护理服务模式，研究组运用急救护理快速反应团队加速急救措施，测算比照两组的护理服务质量满意度测算数据值、5分钟内人员到达现场率测算数据值、接诊-确诊时间测算数据值、静脉给药时间测算数据值、确诊-抢救时间测算数据值，以及护理质量评分测算数据值。结果 研究组的护理服务质量满意度测算数据值高于参照组（P＜0.05）。研究组的5分钟内人员到达现场率测算数据值高于参照组（P＜0.05）。研究组的接诊-确诊时间测算数据值、静脉给药时间测算数据值，以及确诊-抢救时间测算数据值均短于参照组（P＜0.05）。研究组的护理团队合作评分测算数据值、急诊分诊效率评分测算数据值、护理操作规范性评分测算数据值，以及心理护理评分测算数据值均优于参照组（P＜0.05）。结论 对急救患者运用急救护理快速反应团队加速急救措施，价值充分，能支持改善患者的急救护理处置效果，值得推广。
关键词： 急救患者；急救护理快速反应团队加速急救措施；常规护理服务模式；效果比较
Abstract
Objective To demonstrate the efficacy of implementing rapid response team(RRT)emergency care measures for trauma patients. Methods From December 2024 to September 2025,144 emergency patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 72 patients in each group. The reference group received conventional nursing care, while the study group underwent accelerated emergency measures provided by the emergency nursing rapid response team. The satisfaction with the quality of nursing services, the on-site arrival rate within 5 minutes, the time from reception to diagnosis, the time for intravenous medication administration, the time from diagnosis to rescue, and the nursing quality score were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results The satisfaction measurement data value of the nursing service quality in the research group was higher than that in the reference group(P<0.05).The measurement data value of the personnel arrival rate within 5 minutes in the research group was higher than that in the reference group (P<0.05).The measurement data values of the reception-to-diagnosis time, intravenous medication time, and diagnosis-to-rescue time in the research group were all shorter than those in the reference group(P<0.05).The measurement data values of the nursing team cooperation score, emergency triage efficiency score, nursing operation standardization score, and psychological nursing score in the research group were all superior to those in the reference group(P<0.05). Conclusion The RRT emergency care approach demonstrates substantial value in improving trauma patient outcomes, making it a recommended practice worthy of broader implementation.
Key words： Emergency patient; Rapid response team of emergency nursing accelerates emergency measures; Conventional nursing service model; Effect comparison
参考文献 References
[1] 韩露.院前-院内无缝衔接一体化急救护理方案在热射病患者抢救中的应用效果及对神经缺损、症状恢复时间的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2025,10(25):163-166.
[2] 钟鸿耀,林宏,潘盈莹.基于专职化层级的急诊护理对急性脑梗死患者急救效率及神经功能的影响[J].当代医药论丛,2025,23(23):190-192.
[3] 刘梦珠,闫玲,罗莹.细节与风险强化护理模式在急诊多发伤患者急救护理中的应用[J].黑龙江医药科学,2025, 48(08):31-32+36.
[4] 陈莉莉,钱丹.时机理论指导下的快速反应团队模式在急性脑梗死患者急救护理中的应用效果[J].当代医药论丛,2025,23(21):160-163.
[5] 温珊珊,康勉利,于少丹.无缝链接护理联合急救护理策略在多发肋骨骨折伴血气胸患者中的应用[J].罕少疾病杂志,2025,32(07):170-172.
[6] 宋雨轩,杜亚泽.4R危机理论的一体化护理在急诊多发性创伤患者急救护理中的应用[J].海南医学,2025,36(14): 2115-2118.
[7] 朱晓会,李福军.基于渗透式风险预控的急救护理在脑卒中患者中的应用效果[J].中国社区医师,2025,41(19): 145-147.
[8] 韩萍,李伟,刘梦珠,等.基于创伤评分的一体化急救护理模式在急诊多发性创伤患者急救中的应用价值[J].医学临床研究,2025,42(06):1056-1058.
[9] 黄佳,付艳萍,付艳芳.基于急救优先调度系统的院前急救护理路径对急性脑卒中患者救治效率及预后的影响[J].中国当代医药,2025,32(17):159-162+167.
[10] 黄彩云,王珊珊,张奕清.急救护理在急诊糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者中的应用价值及对患者血糖水平的影响[J].糖尿病新世界,2025,28(11):111-113.