期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2026; 5: (2) ; 47-49 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.20260071.

The impact of link quality control combined with risk grading nursing on venous catheter infection in hemodialysis centers
环节质量控制联合风险分级护理对血液透析中心静脉导管感染的影响

作者: 梁燕, 李艳, 雷玉霞, 谢晓华 *

宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川

*通讯作者: 谢晓华,单位:宁夏医科大学总医院 宁夏银川;

发布时间: 2026-02-10 总浏览量: 44

摘要

目的 探讨对血液透析患者实施环节质量控制联合风险分级护理的效果及对中心静脉导管感染的影响。方法 随机抽选2024年6月-2025年6月本院收治的80例血液透析患者,按随机数字表法分组,各40例。对照组予以风险分级护理,观察组同时联合环节质量控制干预,评估对比2组的干预效果。结果 观察组较对照组的CRI及CRBSI的发生率均低(P<0.05)。观察组较对照组的平均导管留置时间更长,而护理质量和满意度评分均比对照组更高(P<0.05)。结论 对血液透析患者开展环节质量控制联合风险分级护理模式,可有效减少中心静脉导管有关感染率,延长导管留置时间,提高护理质量和满意度,总体护理价值高,值得采纳。

关键词: 环节质量控制;风险分级护理;血液透析;中心静脉导管;导管相关感染

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of implementing link quality control combined with risk grading nursing on hemodialysis patients and its impact on central venous catheter infection.
Methods 80 hemodialysis patients admitted to our hospital from June 2024 to June 2025 were randomly selected and divided into groups using a random number table method, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received risk grading nursing, while the observation group received joint quality control interventions. The intervention effects of the two groups were evaluated and compared.
Results The incidence of CRI and CRBSI in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The average catheter retention time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group, and the nursing quality and satisfaction scores were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Implementing a quality control combined with risk grading nursing model for hemodialysis patients can effectively reduce the infection rate related to central venous catheters, prolong catheter retention time, improve nursing quality and satisfaction, and has high overall nursing value, which is worth adopting.

Key words: Quality control in the process; Risk grading nursing; Hemodialysis; Central venous catheter; Catheter related infections

参考文献 References

[1] 李艺娜,张新.综合护理干预对维持性血液透析患者生存质量的影响研究[J].航空航天医学杂志,2025,36(12): 1501-1503.

[2] 顾源红,邹素华,周飞燕.契约式自我管理护理模式对慢性肾衰竭血液透析患者遵医行为及自我管理能力的影响[J].全科医学临床与教育,2025,23(11):1054-1056.

[3] 朱自巧,王蓓,许贤荣,段俗言.多学科团队协作模式在维持性血液透析患者血管通路管理中的应用研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2025,29(20):95-100.

[4] 黄丽,牛洪艳,胡璐璐,赵秀明,孙琳.预防血液透析病人中心静脉导管栓塞的最佳证据及护理实践[J].循证护理, 2025,11(20):4135-4142.

[5] 马丽娜,闫雪,董彦霞.护理风险管理在血液透析科护理管理中的应用效果[J].中国卫生产业,2025,22(20):121-124.

[6] 张小梅,刘梦娇,廖钢林,龚丽佳,蒋丽玲.结构化皮肤管理联合失效模式与效应分析在预防血液透析患者中心静脉导管感染中的应用[J].牡丹江医科大学学报,2025, 46(5):57-61.

[7] 郑晶.环节质量控制联合风险分级护理对血液透析中心静脉导管相关感染情况的影响[J].中国医药指南,2025, 23(9):169-172.

[8] 刘付香.环节质量控制在血液透析室医院感染管理中的应用效果[J].中国社区医师,2023,39(35):167-169.


引用本文

梁燕, 李艳, 雷玉霞, 谢晓华, 环节质量控制联合风险分级护理对血液透析中心静脉导管感染的影响[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2026; 5: (2) : 47-49.