Open Access Article
Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2025; 4: (12) ; 125-128 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.20250644.
Analysis of the application value of nursing intervention in risk assessment for emergency gastroscopy hemostasis in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
风险评估的护理干预在上消化道出血行急诊胃镜下止血患者的应用价值分析
作者:
刘菊莲 *
广西国际壮医医院 广西南宁
*通讯作者:
刘菊莲,单位:广西国际壮医医院 广西南宁;
发布时间: 2025-12-19 总浏览量: 68
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
目的 分析上消化道出血行急诊胃镜下止血患者采用风险评估护理干预的应用价值。方法 选取2023年10月至2024年7月在我院收治的70例上消化道出血行急诊胃镜下止血患者。随机将患者分为对照组(35例,常规护理),观察组(35例,风险评估护理),对比两组患者止血成功率、再出血发生率、住院时间及血清学指标。结果 观察组止血成功率高于对照组,再出血率更低,住院天数更少,血清学指标更优,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 风险评估的护理干预应用于上消化道出血行急诊胃镜下止血患者的价值显著,能有效提高止血成功率,降低再出血发生率,减少住院天数,改善血清学指标。
关键词: 风险评估护理;上消化道出血;急诊胃镜;止血
Abstract
Objective To analyze the application value of risk assessment nursing intervention in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing emergency gastroscopy hemostasis. Methods 70 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent emergency gastroscopy hemostasis and were admitted to our hospital from October 2023 to July 2024 were selected. Randomly divide patients into a control group (35 cases, routine care) and an observation group (35 cases, risk assessment care), and compare the success rate of hemostasis, incidence of rebleeding, length of hospital stay, and serological indicators between the two groups. Results The success rate of hemostasis in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the rebleeding rate was lower, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and the serological indicators were better, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion The nursing intervention of risk assessment applied to patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing emergency gastroscopy hemostasis has significant value, which can effectively improve the success rate of hemostasis, reduce the incidence of rebleeding, reduce hospitalization days, and improve serological indicators.
Key words: Risk assessment nursing; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Emergency gastroscopy; Stop bleeding
参考文献 References
[1] 庄惠娜,谢苗荣. 上消化道出血病因变化及风险评估的研究进展[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2024,23(1):109-113.
[2] 张丽芬. 基于风险评估下的护理措施在消化道出血干预中对患者情绪及危险性积分影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2023,21(36):170-172.
[3] 姜微, 崔晓晖, 戴海蓉. 基于风险评估的护理干预对急性消化道出血患者止血效果的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文),2022,8(8):193-195.
[4] 柴蕴珠,王艳红,徐宏蕊. 基于风险评估的护理干预对急性消化道出血患者负性心理及危险性积分的影响研究[J]. 临床研究,2020,28(2):184-186.
[5] 喻卉,关李稳,刘真义. 胃镜在上消化道出血中的应用价值及再次出血预测列线图模型构建[J]. 影像科学与光化学,2024,42(6):586-592.
[6] 杨吕凤,黄青青,林海燕. 风险护理干预用于急诊胃出血的护理效果观察[J]. 现代实用医学,2021,33(5):652-654.
[7] 马阳阳,郭凯华. 上消化道出血患者术后早期再出血风险预测模型的构建及效果验证[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(21):3271-3276.
[8] 闵秀梅,李倩. 风险护理对急诊上消化道出血内镜治疗患者出血量的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2023, 8(39): 70-72,102.
引用本文
刘菊莲, 风险评估的护理干预在上消化道出血行急诊胃镜下止血患者的应用价值分析[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2025; 4: (12) : 125-128.