摘要
目的 探析骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者护理中行疼痛护理的效果。方法 抽取本院近2年(2023年1月-2025年1月)收治的110例骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者为研究对象,按照护理方法不同分为常规组(常规护理;n=55例)及试验组(疼痛护理;n=55例)。以疼痛评分、护理满意度验证2组效果。结果 疼痛评分显示,护理后试验组显低(P<0.05)。护理满意度显示,试验组显高(P<0.05)。结论 骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者护理中行疼痛护理可显著缓解患者疼痛,促进其康复,进而提高其满意度。此种方法值得推广。
关键词: 骨质疏松;椎体压缩性骨折;疼痛护理;疼痛评分;护理满意度
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of pain management in the nursing of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods 110 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures admitted to our hospital in the past 2 years (January 2023 January 2025) were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into a conventional group (conventional nursing; n=55 cases) and an experimental group (pain nursing; n=55 cases) according to different nursing methods. Validate the effectiveness of two groups using pain scores and nursing satisfaction. Results The pain score showed a significant decrease in the experimental group after nursing (P<0.05). Nursing satisfaction showed that the experimental group was significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Pain management in the nursing of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can significantly alleviate their pain, promote their recovery, and ultimately improve their satisfaction. This method is worth promoting.
Key words: Osteoporosis; Vertebral compression fracture; Pain care; Pain score; Nursing satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 郑礼,秦大平,李磊,等. 骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折PKP术后残余疼痛的防治策略 [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2024, 30 (09): 1348-1352.
[2] 赵丽萍. 老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折经皮椎体成形术围手术期护理研究 [J]. 智慧健康, 2023, 9 (26): 227-230.
[3] 田龙,胡萌,卢俊松,等. 椎体强化术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折早期疼痛缓解不佳的列线图预测模型构建 [J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2023, 21 (05): 331-337.
[4] 蒋茜璇,丁杨,高馨,等. 老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者术后残余疼痛的影响因素分析 [J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2023, 9 (06): 130-132.
[5] 侯宇清,于建桃,杨新明. 综合护理干预用于骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折的疗效 [J]. 生命科学仪器, 2023, 21 (03): 172.
[6] 黄艳勇. 康复治疗在老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折疼痛患者治疗中的效果 [J]. 吉林医学, 2023, 44 (06): 1495-1497.
[7] 区言弟. 全程护理在骨质疏松性胸腰椎体压缩性骨折中的应用效果 [J]. 黑龙江中医药, 2020, 49 (04): 376-377.
[8] 张文萍,王秋芳,张婷. 个性化护理在骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折患者中的术后护理效果及满意度 [J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018, 3 (19): 186-187+198.