Effect of ultra-early rehabilitation nursing intervention on limb function recovery and quality of life in elderly patients with ischemic stroke
超早期康复护理干预对老年缺血性脑卒中患者肢体功能恢复和生活质量的影响

摘要

目的 分析老年缺血性脑卒中用超早期康复护理干预的价值。方法 随机均分2022年4月~2024年3月本科接诊老年缺血性脑卒中病人（n=74）。试验组采取超早期康复护理干预，对照组行常规护理。对比sf-36评分等指标。结果 关于NIHSS评分：干预后，试验组低至（8.03±2.16）分，对照组达到（11.68±3.04）分，比较发现：试验组数据更低（P＜0.05）。FMA评分：干预后，试验组达到（84.17±3.16）分，对照组仅（70.35±4.72）分，比较发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。满意度：试验组达到97.3%，但对照组却仅有78.38%，比较发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。sf-36评分：干预后，试验组达到（86.02±2.54）分，对照组仅（78.01±3.59）分，比较发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。结论 老年缺血性脑卒中用超早期康复护理干预，病人的生活质量更好，满意度更高，肢体功能改善更加明显，神经功能恢复更为迅速。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of super early rehabilitation nursing intervention in senile ischemic stroke.
Methods Randomized to receive elderly ischemic stroke patients from April 2022 to March 2024 (n = 74). The trial group adopted the ultra-early rehabilitation nursing intervention, and the control group did routine care. Compared with sf-36 score.
Results Regarding NIHSS score: after the intervention, as low as (8.03±2.16) in the test group and (11.68±3.04) in the control group, the data were lower (P < 0.05). FMA score: After the intervention, the test group reached (84.17±3.16), and only the control group reached (70.35±4.72), and the comparison group had higher data (P < 0.05). Satisfaction: 97.3% in the test group, but only 78.38% in the control group. The comparison found that the data in the test group were higher (P < 0.05). Sf-36 score: After the intervention, the test group reached (86.02±2.54) and only the control group (78.01±3.59), and the data in the test group were higher (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   With ultra-early rehabilitation nursing intervention in senile ischemic stroke, patients have better quality of life, higher satisfaction, more obvious improvement of limb function and more rapid recovery of neurological function.