期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2024; 3: (5) ; 90-92 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.20240231.

Management of patients with chronic heart failure
慢性心衰病人的管理

作者: 金平, 邱运琼, 杨桂英, 郭晓燕, 罗羽慧 *

重庆市人民医院 重庆

*通讯作者: 罗羽慧,单位:重庆市人民医院 重庆;

发布时间: 2024-05-20 总浏览量: 187

摘要

目的 研究慢性心衰患者采取4P管理模式时的价值。方法 2022年9月~2023年9月,选在我院接收的慢性心衰患者70例,分为观察、参照组。观察组实行4P管理模式,即(1)精准医疗;(2)个性化护理;(3)身心康复;(4)合理膳食。参照组采用常规管理。结果 管理满意率,观察组管理满意率高于参照组,对比差异明显(P<0.05)。SF-36评分,管理前生活质量指标无统计学差异(P>0.05),管理后有统计学意义(P<0.05)。心功能指标水平,管理前心功能指标无明显差异(P>0.05),管理后差异明显(P<0.05)。结论 慢性心衰患者实施4P管理模式,患者认可程度较高,可稳定心功能水平,并提升患者生活质量,值得后期推广应用。

关键词: 4P管理模式;慢性心衰;满意度

Abstract

Objective To study the value of 4P management in patients with chronic heart failure.
Methods From September 2022 to September 2023, 70 patients with chronic heart failure were selected and divided into observation and reference groups. The observation group implements the 4P management model, namely: (1) precision medicine; (2) individualized care; (3) physical and mental rehabilitation; (4) Reasonable diet. Reference groups are managed on a regular basis.
Results The management satisfaction rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in SF-36 score and quality of life index before management (P > 0.05), but there was significant difference after management (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the level of cardiac function indexes before management (P > 0.05), and there was a significant difference in cardiac function index after management (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The implementation of the 4P management model in patients with chronic heart failure has a high degree of recognition from patients, can stabilize the level of cardiac function and improve the quality of life of patients, and is worthy of promotion and application in the future.

Key words: 4P management mode; Chronic heart failure; Satisfaction

参考文献 References

[1] 戴煜,徐杨燕,曹阳. “五E”模式多方位护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者遵医行为及生活质量的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(7):5-8.

[2] 彭欢欢,莫政群,辛宗妍,等. 呼吸训练联合体重管理在慢性心力衰竭病人延续护理中应用的研究进展[J]. 护理研究,2022,36(6):1037-1041.

[3] 崔慧,张祖惠. 自我效能感和应对方式对慢性心力衰竭患者自我护理行为的影响研究[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(8):1322-1323.

[4] 侯聪玲,刘小楠,周平. CCU延续性护理对老年慢性心力衰竭患者认知功能及心理状态的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(13):45-47.

[5] 韩燕,甘翔. 基于“互联网+”的延续性护理对慢性心力衰竭患者运动耐力、生活质量及预后的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学,2022,46(24):3046-3048.

[6] 周新圆,赵静静,曾余佳,等. 延续性护理对慢性心力衰竭患者短期预后的影响[J]. 中国医药,2022,17(1):132-135.

[7] 周新圆,闫婷,程梦圆. 慢性心力衰竭患者自我护理维持的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国医药,2022,17(6):916-919.

[8] 岑梅,金铭. 优护+容量自我管理模式对慢性心衰患者生存质量的影响. 昆明医科大学学报,2021,42(12):177-182.

引用本文

金平, 邱运琼, 杨桂英, 郭晓燕, 罗羽慧, 慢性心衰病人的管理[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2024; 3: (5) : 90-92.