摘要
目的 讨论并研究尿流动力学导管F8,F6对于尿流率的影响。方法 研究数据选取2023.4.18-2024.1.17共计108位患者尿动力检查结果，将使用F8导管的患者定义为F8组，共60位患者；将使用F6导管的患者定义为F6组，共48位患者。对比两组患者置管时疼痛、置管前患者组间最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量及置管后患者组间最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量。结果 ①F6组患者的VRS疼痛评分明显小于F8组，且F6组患者的无痛率明显高于F8组，上述数据对比差异均有统计学差异（P＜0.05）；②置管前患者组间最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量比较无显著差异，无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；③相较于置管前，置管后患者组间最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量有所改善。但与F8组患者相比，F6组患者的最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量均较高，对比有统计学差异（P＜0.05）。结论 尿流动力学导管F6在临床上具有减少患者置管时疼痛，改善患者最大尿流率、平均尿流率及尿流量的作用，有临床推广价值。
关键词： 尿流动力学；导管F8；导管F6；尿流率；影响
Abstract
Objective To discuss and study the effect of urinary flow mechanics catheter F8 and F6 on urinary flow rate. Methods A total of 108 patients were selected from 2023.4.18 to 2024.1.17 for the study data. Patients using F8 catheter were defined as F8 group, with a total of 60 patients. Patients using F6 catheters were defined as the F6 group, a total of 48 patients. Pain during catheterization, maximum, average and urinary flow rate between groups before catheterization and maximum, average and urinary flow rate between groups after catheterization were compared between the two groups. Results (1) The VRS pain score of F6 group was significantly lower than that of F8 group, and the pain-free rate of F6 group was significantly higher than that of F8 group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). ② Before catheterization, there were no significant differences in the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate among groups (P > 0.05). (3) Compared with before and after catheterization, the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate were improved. However, compared with F8 group, the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate in F6 group were higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion F6 can reduce the pain and improve the maximum urine flow rate, average urine flow rate and urine flow rate in patients with catheterization, and has the value of clinical promotion.
Key words： urine flow mechanics; Catheter F8; Catheter F6; Urine flow rate; influence
参考文献 References
[1] 殷凤朝,李芳,孙超,等. 尿动力检测中尿道测压管对尿流率的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(2):110-112.
[2] 孙家各,孙博,侯备,等. 等离子电切联合球囊扩张导管治疗男性尿道狭窄的效果[J]. 武警医学,2023,34(3):210-213.
[3] 周毅,李恭会,阎家骏,等. 输尿管扩张导管联合球囊扩张导管处理尿道狭窄的临床体会[J]. 中华男科学杂志,2016,22(1):42-45.
[4] 李海明,唐磊,李钧. 输尿管软镜碎石术后留置输尿管支架与输尿管导管的有效性与安全性研究[J]. 中国医刊,2023,58(3):298-301.
[5] 何海填,罗锦斌,曾灿,等. 输尿管导管负压吸引辅助输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管结石合并感染的效果[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2023,29(11):86-90.
[6] 陈月英,陈泽波,孟作为,等. 尿道内置导管对前列腺增生患者尿流率测定的影响研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2009,15(16):52-53.
[7] 张鹏,武治津,高居忠. 压力-流率测定中尿道内置测压导管对尿流率的影响[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(4):274-276.
[8] 洪诗哲. BPH尿动力学检查时尿道内置管对最大尿流率的影响[J]. 浙江医学,2001,23(6):380-381.
[9] 常冉,王菲,张建忠,等. 静态尿道测压中气态测压导管的可重复性研究[J]. 中华医学杂志,2023,103(6):449-451.
[10] 冯娜,井水,陈钟玉,等. 术前预置输尿管导管在盆腔粘连患者腹腔镜下全子宫切除术中的应用[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2021,20(7):759-762.
[11] 张立芳,唐世倩,孙如意,等.压力性尿失禁女性患者尿流率和尿流率曲线的临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志, 2020(4):4.
[12] 邓军洪,王良圣,姜粹平.245例前列腺增生患者尿流动力学的结果分析[J].中国男科学杂志, 2000, 14(4):3.
[13] 张文瑾,袁帅,郝芮.尿流动力学导管相关感染的危险因素分析与预防对策[J].中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(13):2.
[14] 刘力搏,许盛飞,杜广辉. 压力-流率测定时尿道内置管对尿流率影响的研究现状[J]. 华中科技大学学报（医学版）,2018,47(4):502-507.
[15] 王江华,吴文波,吴竞生. 尿流率测定在小儿人工尿道中的应用[J]. 江西医药,2019,54(9):1085-1086,1091.