Study the methods and experience of arterial blood gas analysis and collection for emergency critical patients
研究针对急诊危重症患者紧急抢救时动脉血气分析采集方法及经验探讨

摘要

目的 探究为了得到最有效的效果，改善急诊危重症患者紧急抢救时的干预方式时，选择动脉血气 分析采集方法及经验。方法 均采用计算机随机选择，选择 2021 年 9 月 1 日～2022 年 2 月 28 日期间来我院急诊 抢救室的急危重症患者 350 例为对照组，采用握笔式垂直进针法（90°） 。2022 年 3 月 1 日～2022 年 8 月 31 日 期间来我院急诊抢救室的急危重症患者 350 例为观察组，采用持针式斜面进针法。将两组患者的动脉血气分析采 集成功率、患者满意度进行比较。结果 在动脉血气分析采集成功率控制方面，两组数据差异较大（P＜0.05）； 在满意度控制方面，两组数据差异较大，（P＜0.05）。结论 改善急诊危重症患者紧急抢救时的干预方式时，选 择动脉血气分析采集方法有助于提升动脉血气分析采集成功率，患者的满意度较高。

Abstract

Objective To explore the selection of arterial blood gas analysis and collection methods and experience in order to obtain the most effective effect and improve the intervention methods for emergency rescue of critically ill patients.
Methods All patients were randomly selected by computer, and 350 patients with acute and critical illness who came to the emergency rescue room of our hospital from September 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022 were selected as the control group, and the vertical needling method (90°) was used. From March 1, 2022 to August 31, 2022, 350 critically ill patients who came to the emergency rescue room of our hospital served as the observation group, and the needle holding inclined plane injection method was used. The success rate of arterial blood gas analysis and collection and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
Results In terms of the control of the success rate of arterial blood gas analysis and collection, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05); In terms of satisfaction control, the data of the two groups were significantly different (P<0.05).
Conclusion   When improving the intervention mode of emergency rescue for critical patients, the selection of arterial blood gas analysis and collection method can help to improve the success rate of arterial blood gas analysis and collection, and patients' satisfaction is high.