Effect Analysis of Hydrogen Peroxide Low Temperature Plasma Sterilizer in Quality Control of SurgicalInstrument Sterilization
过氧化氢低温等离子灭菌器在手术器械灭菌质量控制中的效果分析

摘要

目的 探究分析过氧化氢低温等离子灭菌器在手术器械灭菌质量控制中的效果。方法 选取于 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月，院内需要进行消毒灭困的手术器械共 102 件作为本次研究对象。其中 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月，应用戊二醛熏蒸灭菌消毒（51 件），作为本次研究的对照组，2022 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月，应用过氧 化氢低温等离子灭菌器进修灭菌消毒（51 件），作为本次研究的观察组。对比两组的生物监测合格率；灭菌时 间；灭菌有效时间；不良事件发生率以及相关医护人员对于灭菌方式的满意程度。结果 在生物监测合格率方面， 两组对比无明显差异，P＞0.05，在灭菌时间；灭菌有效时间；不良事件发生率以及相关医护人员对于灭菌方式 的满意程度方面，观察组优于对照组，P＜0.05。结论 采用过氧化氢低温等离子灭菌器进行灭菌，能够在保障灭 菌效果的同时，改善灭菌时间；灭菌有效时间；不良事件发生率以及相关医护人员对于灭菌方式的满意程度，值 得推广与应用。

Abstract

Objective To explore and analyze the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilizer in the quality control of surgical instrument sterilization.
Methods From January 2022 to December 2022, a total of 102 surgical instruments that need to be disinfected in the hospital were selected as the objects of this study. From January 2022 to June 2022, glutaraldehyde fumigation sterilization (51 items) was used as the control group of this study, and from July 2022 to December 2022, hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilizer was used for further sterilization (51 items) as the observation group of this study. The qualified rate of biological monitoring was compared between the two groups. Sterilization time; Effective sterilization time; The incidence of adverse events and the satisfaction of relevant health care workers with the sterilization method.
Results There was no significant difference in the qualified rate of biological monitoring between the two groups (P>0.05). Effective sterilization time; The incidence of adverse events and the satisfaction of related medical staff with sterilization methods were better in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Using hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilizer for sterilization can not only guarantee the sterilization effect but also improve the sterilization time. Effective sterilization time; The incidence of adverse events and the satisfaction of relevant medical staff with the sterilization method are worthy of promotion and application.