期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2023; 2: (8) ; 169-171 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.2023000519.

Observation on the effect of nursing intervention of health education path applied to Shingles
健康宣教路径应用于带状疱疹的护理干预效果观察

作者: 余琼 *

武汉市中心医院 湖北武汉

*通讯作者: 余琼,单位:武汉市中心医院 湖北武汉;

发布时间: 2023-08-10 总浏览量: 251

摘要

目的 观察在带状疱疹的护理干预中应用健康宣教路径的具体效果。方法 采用 2021 年 12 月-2022 年 12 月我院收治的 89 例带状疱疹患者,将其中 45 例实行常规护理的患者列为对照组,另外 44 例实行健康宣教 路径护理干预的患者列为观察组,对比护理后两组患者 GCQ、SIS、DLQI 评分,对两组心理状态评分及护理满 意程度进行比较。结果 观察组患者临床各项评分均优于对照组,心理状态评分优于对照组,其护理满意度高于 对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对带状疱疹患者的护理干预中实行健康宣教路径其效果明确, 提高临床各项评分,改善患者不良情绪,提高护理满意程度。

关键词: 健康宣教路径;带状疱疹;护理干预;效果观察

Abstract

Objective To observe the specific effect of applying health education path in the nursing intervention of Shingles.
Methods Eighty nine patients with Shingles admitted to our hospital from December 2021 to December 2022 were used. Among them, 45 patients who received routine nursing were included in the control group, and 44 patients who received health education path nursing intervention were included in the observation group. After nursing, the GCQ, SIS, DLQI scores of the two groups were compared, and the psychological status scores and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared.
Results The clinical scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group, and the psychological state scores were better than those of the control group. Their nursing satisfaction was higher than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   The implementation of health education path in the nursing intervention of patients with Shingles has a clear effect, improves the clinical scores, improves the patients' bad mood, and improves the degree of nursing satisfaction.

Key words: Health education path; Shingles; Nursing intervention; Effect observation

参考文献 References

[1] 黄素毅,韦冠京,陈洁连等.个性化健康教育对头面部带状 疱 疹 患 者 生 活 质 量 的 影 响 [J]. 右 江 医 学 ,2020,48(01):41-44.

[2] 赵丽,赵萌,王爱敏.带状疱疹后神经痛的危险因素[J].济宁医学院学报,2023,46(02):96-100.

[3] 陈洁,朱永军,邓乐英.基于因素评估的针对性护理干预在带状疱疹患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(22):128-131.

[4] 曹凯娜,于思思,张艺丹等.带状疱疹患者急性期后疼痛的 危 险 因 素 研 究 [J]. 神 经 疾 病 与 精 神 卫 生 ,2022,22(10):704-708.

[5] 张贞妹,陈碧容,陈红.专题健康教育联合针对性疼痛干预对带状疱疹患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(12):58-61.

[6] 黄淑雅,宋静卉,王思思.综合护理在带状疱疹患者护理中 的 应 用 效 果 [J]. 保 健 医 学 研 究 与 实 践 ,2022,19(06):64-67.

[7] 谭剑萍,徐丽华,黄燕君.健康教育联合疼痛护理对带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者睡眠质量的影响[J].中国医学创新,2022,19(15):113-117.

[8] 王胜雅.不同护理模式对带状疱疹后遗神经痛的影响[J].继续医学教育,2022,36(02):125-128.

[9] 康雪莲.健康教育和心理护理对老年带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者的临床效果[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(20):190.

[10] 夏朝晖,冉云芬.全方位健康宣教路径干预对行 PCNL 肾结石患者知识掌握程度及护理满意度的影响[J].现代医药卫生,2021,37(11):1930-1932.

引用本文

余琼, 健康宣教路径应用于带状疱疹的护理干预效果观察[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2023; 2: (8) : 169-171.