摘要
目的 观察针对性急诊护理干预用于心肺复苏后对病人康复效果的干预作用。方法 对 2020 年 10 月
-2022 年 9 月本科接诊心肺复苏病人（n=78）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各 39 人，前者采取针对性急诊护理干
预，后者行常规护理。对比不良反应等指标。结果 关于总有效率，试验组数据 97.44%，和对照组数据 82.0%相比
更高（P＜0.05）。关于不良反应：试验组发生率 2.56%，和对照组数据 20.51%相比更低（P＜0.05）。关于心率：
干预结束时，试验组数据（98.13±6.27）次/min，和对照组数据（86.14±7.83）次/min 相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于
住院时间，试验组数据（9.05±1.03）d，和对照组数据（11.04±1.57）d 相比更短（P＜0.05）。关于满意度，试验
组数据 97.44%，和对照组数据 79.49%相比更高（P＜0.05）。结论 心肺复苏用针对性急诊护理干预，不良反应发
生率更低，住院时间更短，康复效果提升更为迅速，满意度改善更加明显。
关键词： 针对性急诊护理干预；不良反应；心肺复苏；满意度
Abstract
Objective To observe the intervention effect of targeted emergency nursing intervention on the
recovery effect of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods Undergraduate patients receiving
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=78) from October 2020 to September 2022 were randomly divided into 39
subjects in each of the experimental and control groups. The former received targeted emergency nursing
intervention, and the latter received routine nursing. Compare adverse reactions and other indicators. Results The
total effective rate of experimental group was 97.44%, which was higher than that of control group (82.0%)
(P<0.05). About adverse reactions: the incidence of the experimental group was 2.56%, which was lower than that
of the control group (20.51%, P<0.05). Heart rate: At the end of the intervention, the experimental group data
(98.13±6.27） beats /min, compared with the control group data (86.14±7.83) beats /min (P<0.05). The length of
hospital stay in the experimental group was shorter (9.05±1.03) days than that in the control group (11.04±1.57)
days (P < 0.05). As for satisfaction, the data of the experimental group was 97.44%, which was higher than that of
the control group, 79.49% (P<0.05). Conclusion Targeted emergency nursing intervention for cardiopulmonary
resuscitation has lower incidence of adverse reactions, shorter hospital stay, faster improvement of rehabilitation
effect and more obvious improvement of satisfaction.
Key words： Targeted emergency nursing intervention; Adverse reactions; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation;Degree of satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 刘敦玉,蒋静,刘艳. 针对性急诊护理干预对心肺复苏后患者康复效果的影响分析[J]. 心理月刊,2020,15（7）:110.
[2] 陈敏,蒋红梅. 针对性急诊护理干预对心肺复苏后患者康复效果的影响分析[J]. 科学养生,2022,25（1）:113-114.
[3] TAEB, MAHSHEED, LEVIN, AMANDA B., SPAEDER,MICHAELC., et al. Comparison of Pediatric CardiopulmonaryResuscitation Quality in Classic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation EventsUsing Video Review*[J]. Pediatric critical care medicine: ajournal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the WorldFederation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies,2018,19（9）:831-838.
[4] 李梦萍. 急诊护理干预对心肺复苏后患者康复效果的影响[J]. 心理医生,2018,24（12）:253-254.
[5] 李毅萍. 针对性护理干预在急诊科心脏骤停行心肺复苏 患者 中 的 应 用 效 果 评 价 [J]. 医 学 理 论 与 实 践 ,2019,32（15）:2454-2455.
[6] MEANEY,P.A., BOBROW,B.J., MANCINI,M.E., et al.Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiacresuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: Aconsensus statement from the American heart association[J].Circulation: An Official Journal of the American HeartAssociation,2019,128（4）:417-435.
[7] 郭瑞,刘学伟,张苗. 心脏骤停患者心肺复苏后采用急诊护理干预的临床康复效果及对不良反应的影响价值研究[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46（2）:335-336.
[8] 陈颖. 针对性急诊护理干预对心肺复苏后患者康复效果的影响[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志,2022,39（3）:309.