The influence of accompanied delivery nursing on delivery
全程陪伴分娩护理助产对分娩的影响

摘要

目的 分析全程陪伴分娩护理助产用于产妇分娩中的价值。方法 对 2021 年 11 月-2022 年 10 月本科接诊分娩产妇（n=80）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各 40 人，前者采取全程陪伴分娩护理助产法， 后者行常规护理。对比产程时间等指标。结果 关于自然分娩成功率，试验组数据 97.56%，和对照组数据 82.93%相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于第一、第二、第三与总产程时间，试验组数据比对照组短（P＜0.05）。 关于产后出血这个指标：试验组发生率 2.44%，和对照组数据 14.63%相比更低（P＜0.05）。关于 SDS 和 SAS 评分：试验组数据分别是（35.21±4.21）分、（36.28±4.79）分，和对照组数据（46.37±5.83）分、（47.95±6.04） 分相比更低（P＜0.05）。关于满意度，试验组数据 97.5%，和对照组数据 80.0%相比更高（P＜0.05）。结论 产 妇分娩用全程陪伴分娩护理助产法，产程时间更短，自然分娩成功率更高，产后出血发生率也更低，满意 度改善更加明显，负性情绪缓解更为迅速。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of accompanied delivery nursing assisted delivery in the whole process.
Methods From November 2021 to October 2022, pregnant women (n=80) who received undergraduate delivery were randomly divided into 40 patients in each of the two groups. The former received whole-course delivery nursing and the latter received routine nursing. Compare labor time and other indicators.
Results The success rate of natural delivery was 97.56% in the experimental group, which was higher than 82.93% in the control group (P<0.05). The first, second, third and total labor time in experimental group was shorter than that in control group (P<0.05）. As for postpartum hemorrhage, the incidence of the experimental group was 2.44%, which was lower than the control group's 14.63% (P<0.05). SDS and SAS scores: the scores of the test group were (35.21±4.21) and (36.28±4.79), respectively, which were lower than those of the control group (46.37±5.83) and (47.95±6.04) (P<0.05). As for satisfaction, the data of the experimental group was 97.5%, which was higher than that of the control group 80.0% (P<0.05).
Conclusion   With the whole delivery nursing assisted delivery method, the labor time is shorter, the success rate of natural delivery is higher, the incidence of postpartum bleeding is lower, the satisfaction is more obvious, and the negative emotion is relieved more quickly.