Application analysis of predictive nursing in anesthesia nursing in operating room
预见性护理在手术室麻醉护理中的应用分析

摘要

目的 分析预见性护理用于手术室麻醉护理的价值。方法 对 2021 年 1 月-2022 年 10 月本院手 术室接诊病人（n=120）进行随机分组，试验和对照组各 60 人，前者采取预见性护理，后者行常规护理。 对比不良反应等指标。结果 关于并发症，试验组发生率 3.33%，和对照组数据 21.67%相比更低（P＜0.05）。 关于 VAS 评分，试验组数据（3.37±0.69）分，和对照组数据（4.25±1.09）分相比更低（P＜0.05）。关于心 率：干预结束时，试验组数据（79.15±5.24）次/min，和对照组数据（93.58±5.93）次/min 相比更低（P＜0.05）。 关于满意度，试验组数据 96.675%，和对照组数据 80.0%相比更高（P＜0.05）。关于护理质量这个指标： 试验组数据（98.52±0.93）分，对照组数据（91.58±1.46）分。结论 手术室麻醉护理用预见性护理，不良反 应发生率更低，术后疼痛感更轻，心率稳定性更高，满意度提升也更加明显，护理质量改善更为迅速。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of predictive nursing in anesthesia nursing in operating room.
Methods Patients admitted to the operating room of our hospital from January 2021 to October 2022 (n=120) were randomly divided into 60 patients in each of the experimental and control groups. The former received predictive nursing, and the latter received routine nursing. Compare adverse reactions and other indicators.
Results The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 3.33%, which was lower than 21.67% in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS score of the experimental group (3.37±0.69) was lower than that of the control group (4.25±1.09) (P < 0.05). Heart rate: At the end of the intervention, the experimental group (79.15±5.24) beats /min was lower than the control group (93.58±5.93) beats /min (P < 0.05). As for satisfaction, the data of the experimental group was 96.675%, which was higher than that of the control group 80.0% (P < 0.05). About the quality of nursing this index: experimental group data (98.52±0.93） points, control group data (91.58±1.46) points
Conclusion   anesthesia nursing in the operating room with predictive nursing, the incidence of adverse reactions is lower, postoperative pain is less, heart rate stability is higher, satisfaction is more obvious, the quality of nursing improvement is more rapid.