Open Access Article
Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2022; 1: (8) ; 40-42 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.202200474.
The value of systematic nursing in severe pneumonia
系统护理在重症肺炎中的价值
作者:
樊雪 *
河北中石油中心医院 河北廊坊
*通讯作者:
樊雪,单位:河北中石油中心医院 河北廊坊;
发布时间: 2022-11-25 总浏览量: 298
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
万方数据(WANFANG DATA)
摘要
目的 探讨系统护理在重症肺炎中的应用价值。方法 研究时间截取 2020 年 1 月-2021 年 1 月,
研究对象为在此时间点内于我院就诊治疗的重症肺炎 90 例,遵循数字表随机重组排序法将其均分为两组各
45 例,即接受常规护理的对照组与接受系统护理的观察组,通过对两组动脉血氧指标[血氧分压(PaO2)、
二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)]以及护理满意度调查结果评价其护理效果。结果 观察
组在护理后的 PaO2、PaO2/FiO2 高于对照组、PaCO2 低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的护理满意度调查结
果优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在重症肺炎的临床护理干预中,选择系统护理有助于改善患者的动脉血氧
情况,促进病情及身体恢复速度,并且提高患者及家属对护理工作质量的满意与认可,值得推广。
关键词: 重症肺炎;系统护理;动脉血氧;护理满意度
Abstract
Objective To explore the application value of systematic nursing in severe pneumonia. Methods
The research time was cut from January 2020 to January 2021. The subjects were 90 cases of severe pneumonia
treated in our hospital at this time point. They were divided into two groups, 45 cases in each group, according to
the random reorganization sorting method of the number table, namely, the control group receiving routine care and
the observation group receiving systematic care, The nursing effect was evaluated by investigating the arterial
blood oxygen index (PaO2, PaCO2, PaO2/FiO2) and nursing satisfaction of the two groups. Results After nursing,
PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and PaCO2 was lower than
those in the control group (P<0.05); The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was better than that of the
control group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the clinical nursing intervention of severe pneumonia, the selection of
systematic nursing is helpful to improve the arterial blood oxygen status of patients, promote the speed of illness
and body recovery, and improve the satisfaction and recognition of patients and their families on the quality of
nursing work, which is worth promoting.
Key words: Severe pneumonia; Systematic nursing; Arterial blood oxygen; Nursing satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 曾琴兵,关键,李黎明,等. 肺部超声评分与重症肺炎患者炎症指标关系及对病情危重程度和疗效的评估价值[J].影像研究与医学应用,2022,6(10):136-139.
[2] 陈赛,陈亚南,毛琦善. 支气管镜技术在重症肺炎治疗中的应用[J]. 中国医刊,2021,56(9):948-950.
[3] 韩爱侠,卢月珍,林艺珍.系统化护理干预在重症医学科重症肺炎患者护理中的临床应用[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(06):135+138.
[4] 中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等. 成人社区获得性肺炎基层诊疗指南(2018 年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(2):117-126.
[5] 蔡娟. PDCA 护理模式对重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭患者血气及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019,19(12):2118-2120.
[6] 黄庆玲.分析系统化护理干预在重症肺炎患者护理中的应用[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(15):139.
[7] 张贺,胜立那,刘芳,等. 系统化护理干预在重症肺炎患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(23):118.
[8] 崔嬿嬿,孔羽.系统性护理对 ICU 重症肺炎患者的干预效果及对 VAP 的预防价值[J].国际护理学杂志,2020,39(22):4147-4149.
引用本文
樊雪, 系统护理在重症肺炎中的价值[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2022; 1: (8) : 40-42.