期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2022; 1: (6) ; 31-33 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.202200339.

The application effect of systematic nursing intervention in spinal fracture combined with spinal cord injurysurgery
系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的应用效果

作者: 马冰清 *, 邓强

甘肃省中医院 甘肃兰州

*通讯作者: 马冰清,单位:甘肃省中医院 甘肃兰州;

发布时间: 2022-11-04 总浏览量: 350

摘要

目的 实验将针对脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术患者实施护理,重点分析系统护理干预的效果,优化治 疗方案。方法 针对 80 例脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术患者为对象,样本来源于 2021 年 3 月-2022 年 2 月就诊的患 者,按照时间划分两个对比组,对照组为常规护理,观察组为系统护理干预,对比治疗成果。结果 从数据可见, 观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同时,在生活质量指标对比中,观察组评分高于 对照组,差异显著(P<0.05)。此外,对比患者手术后疼痛度,在术后 1 天和术后 3 天两组患者均存在差异(P <0.05)。最后,对比治疗依从性,两组患者有不同程度的提升,且观察组高于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05)。 结论 采用系统护理对于脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术患者,有助于改善其临床病情,提升生活质量,防控并发症发 生,故值得推广。

关键词: 系统护理;脊柱骨折;脊髓损伤;术后疼痛度;生活质量;手术并发症

Abstract

Objective The experiment will treat the patients with spinal fracture and spinal cord injury surgery, focus on analyzing the effect of systematic nursing intervention, and optimize the treatment plan.
Methods For 80 patients with spinal cord fracture and spinal cord injury surgery, the sample was obtained from the patients treated from March 2021 to February 2022, two comparison groups were divided by time, control group was routine care, and observation group was systematic nursing intervention, and the treatment results were compared.
Results From the data, the complication rate in the observed group was lower than that in the control group, and it was statistically significant (P <0.05). Meanwhile, in the quality of life index comparison, the observation group had higher scores than the control group, with significant differences (P <0.05). In addition, the difference existed between the two groups at 1 day and 3 days after surgery (P <0.05). Finally, compared with the treatment compliance, the two groups showed different degrees of improvement, and the observation group was higher than the control group, with significant differences (P <0.05).
Conclusion   systematic nursing for spinal fracture surgery can improve their clinical condition, improve the quality of life, and prevent and control complications, so it is worth promoting.

Key words: systematic care; spinal fracture; spinal cord injury; postoperative pain; quality of life; surgicalcomplications

参考文献 References

[1] 曹桂花.系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的应用价值分析[J].中国农村卫生,2020,12(02):54+56.

[2] 李晓明.系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的效果观察[J].山东医学高等专科学校学报,2018,40(03):216-218.

[3] 解会军.系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的应用价值体会[J].健康之路,2018,17(06):169-170.

[4] 陈亚楠,陈亚君.优质护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术围手术期的应用效果[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(10):1884-1885.

[5] 赵少楠.系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的应用[J].黑龙江医药科学,2018,41(02):131-132.

[6] 闫姣姣.分析在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中应用系统护理干预的效果[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(87):222+224.

[7] 许晨曦 护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的护理效果分析 . 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2018 ,5(65):145,147

[8] 王敬 优质护理干预对脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术患者的护理效果分析 . 中国伤残医学, 2019 ,27 (19) :62-63

引用本文

马冰清, 邓强, 系统护理干预在脊柱骨折合并脊髓损伤手术中的应用效果[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2022; 1: (6) : 31-33.