摘要
目的 探讨延伸护理服务在老年房颤患者中的效果。方法 将我院 2019 年 1 月-2022 年 1 月 100
例老年房颤患者,双盲随机法分二组。对照组给予常规护理,实验组实施常规护理联合延伸护理服务。比
较两组出院半年后生活质量评分、半年内再次因房颤入院治疗的人数。结果 出院时两组生活质量评分比较,
对照组是 65.84±3.33 分,实验组是 65.64±3.34 分,P>0.05,出院半年后两组均显著升高,而其中实验组
90.21±3.56 分显著高于对照组 80.12±3.33 分,P<0.05。实验组半年内再次因房颤入院治疗的人数低于对照
组(P<0.05)。实验组半年内再次因房颤入院治疗的人数有 1 例,占 2.5%,而对照组半年内再次因房颤入院
治疗的人数 8 例,占 16.0%。结论 老年房颤患者实施常规护理联合延伸护理服务效果确切,可有效改善患
者出院后的病情和生活质量,降低再入院率。
关键词: 延伸护理服务;老年房颤患者;效果
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of extended nursing service in elderly patients with atrial
fibrillation. Methods 100 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022
were divided into two groups by double-blind randomization. The control group received routine nursing, while the
experimental group received routine nursing combined with extended nursing services. The quality of life scores
after six months of discharge and the number of patients who were re-admitted to hospital for atrial fibrillation
within six months were compared between the two groups. Results The quality of life scores of the two groups
were compared at the time of discharge, the control group was 65.84±3.33 points, the experimental group was
65.64±3.34 points, P>0.05, after six months of discharge, both groups were significantly increased, and the
experimental group was 90.21±3.56 points significantly It was higher than the control group by 80.12±3.33 points,
P<0.05. The number of patients admitted to hospital for atrial fibrillation again within six months in the
experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In the experimental group, 1 patient was
admitted to hospital again for atrial fibrillation within six months, accounting for 2.5%, while the number of
patients in the control group who was admitted to hospital again for atrial fibrillation within half a year was 8,
accounting for 16.0%. Conclusion The implementation of routine nursing combined with extended nursing service
in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is effective, which can effectively improve the patient's condition and
quality of life after discharge, and reduce the readmission rate.
Key words: extended nursing service; Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation; effect
参考文献 References
[1] 郑爱娣,王咏梅,徐静,邹海英. 基于时机理论的延续护理在房颤合并慢性心力衰竭患者中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学,2022,20(07):1259-1262.
[2] 杨程程. 网络延续护理干预对射频消融术治疗患者用药依从性及护理满意度的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志,2022,31(11):1603-1606.
[3] 王咏梅,蔡丽丽,徐静,金建芬,宁丽,汤阿毛. 基于健康赋权理论的心房颤动患者延续性护理方案的构建[J]. 护理与康复,2022,21(03):1-6.
[4] 孙利甫. 延续护理在心房颤动射频消融患者术后管理中的应用效果[J]. 黑龙江中医药,2021,50(06):322-323.
[5] 刘曦. 延续性护理联合健康教育对心房颤动患者华法林服药依从性的意义[J]. 中国医药指南,2021,19(29):162-163.
[6] 姚雨霏,陈红武,王琳,戴维思,姜红梅,陈玉洁,孙国珍. 心房颤动患者不同射频消融术式术后胃肠道症状与生活质量关系的探讨[J]. 中华全科医学,2021,19(09):1584-1588.
[7] 李晓彤. 老年冠心病合并房颤患者行 PCI 术后的护理对策及效果分析[J]. 中外医疗,2021,40(20):156-159+164.
[8] 林秋珍,韩冰,刘启明. 心房颤动诊断管理指南更新解读[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2021,37(05):485-488.
[9] 方储馨,周晓娟,徐健,詹玲. 心房颤动患者生活质量及护理干预研究进展[J]. 锦州医科大学学报,2021,42(02):110-113.
[10] 朱文青,陈庆兴. 《2020ESC/EACTS 心房颤动诊断与管理指南》更新解读[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2020,36(11):975-977.