期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Nursing Medicine. 2022; 1: (3) ; 109-111 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmnm.202200168.

Effect evaluation of whole course seamless nursing intervention in operating room nursing
全程无缝隙护理干预在手术室护理中的效果评价

作者: 孙畅丽 *

惠州市中心人民医院 广东惠州

*通讯作者: 孙畅丽,单位:惠州市中心人民医院 广东惠州;

发布时间: 2022-08-02 总浏览量: 292

摘要

目的 探究对手术室患者实施全程无缝隙护理干预的效果。方法 文章研究人员选取时间 2021 年 2 月到 2022 年 4 月,共选取手术室患者共 60 人,随机分成研究组、对照组,平均每组患者 30 人,比对 两组护理效果。结果 研究组病人术中用时、出血量数值更低,术后排气、下床活动时间以及总住院时长更 短,P 值小于 0.05;研究组手术患者情绪与对照组相比更加平稳,全程无缝隙护理后 SAS、SDS 评分更低, P 值小于 0.05;研究组病人术后各项生命体征与对照组相比更平稳,P 值小于 0.05;研究组术后并发症总例 数仅为 1 例,明显低于对照组,P 值小于 0.05。结论 手术室患者应用全程无缝隙护理,患者手术时间、术 中出血量明显减少,治疗舒适度提高,不良情绪得到缓解。

关键词: 全程无缝隙护理;手术室;围手术期指标;并发症

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of whole process seamless nursing intervention on patients in operating room.
Methods the researchers selected a total of 60 patients in the operating room from February 2021 to April 2022, and randomly divided them into the study group and the control group, with an average of 30 patients in each group. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared.
Results the study group had lower intraoperative time and bleeding volume, shorter postoperative exhaust, out of bed activity time and total length of hospitalization, P < 0.05; Compared with the control group, the mood of the patients in the study group was more stable, and the SAS and SDS scores were lower after the whole seamless nursing, with a p value of less than 0.05; The postoperative vital signs of patients in the study group were more stable than those in the control group, P < 0.05; The total number of postoperative complications in the study group was only 1, significantly lower than that in the control group, P < 0.05.
Conclusion   with the application of seamless nursing in the whole process, the operation time and intraoperative bleeding of patients in the operating room are significantly reduced, the treatment comfort is improved, and the bad mood is relieved.

Key words: whole process seamless nursing; Operation room; Perioperative indicators; complication

参考文献 References

[1] 景芳,刘亚玲.全程无缝隙护理对手术室患儿术后疼痛及家属满意度的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(10):167-169.

[2] 龙玲,高颖.全程无缝隙护理干预在手术室护理中的效果评价[J].基层医学论坛,2022,26(09):123-125.

[3] 杨芹,王威啸,杭青.手术室全程无缝隙护理对前列腺电切术患者生理应激指标、负性情绪及生活质量的影响[J].名医,2022(03):147-149.

[4] 程燕君,梁秀明.手术室患者应用无缝隙护理的效果观察[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2022,37(02):196-197.

[5] 李伟珍,胡婉梅,成晓花,黄文斌.全程无缝隙护理干预模式对手术室护理质量的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2021,7(10):175-177.

[6] 李常娥.全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中应用对患者应激反应、满意度的影响[J].航空航天医学杂志,2021,32(10):1245-1247.

[7] 刘玺.手术室巡回无缝隙护理模式缓解心脏手术患者紧张情绪的效果研究[J].吉林医学,2021,42(10):2543-2545.

[8] 高明施.无缝隙护理策略对手术室护理质量以及护理满意度的意义探讨[J].中国医药指南,2021,19(15):185-186.

[9] 任海燕.全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中的应用及预后分析[J].中国药物与临床,2021,21(01):157-159.

[10] 孙梅.手术室无缝隙护理模式对患者应激反应及心理状态的影响[J].心理月刊,2020,15(23):108-109.

[11] 崔媛婧 全程无缝隙护理在手术室护理中的应用效果及对患者预后改善的影响 . 家有孕宝, 2021 ,3 (3) :215

引用本文

孙畅丽, 全程无缝隙护理干预在手术室护理中的效果评价[J]. 现代护理医学杂志, 2022; 1: (3) : 109-111.